Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Local Updates

  1. Save the date, Ken Jenkins is scheduled to return for a two part series scheduled for March 21, 2007 and April 18, 2007 @ 7 pm. Details will be posted at a later date.
  2. Local activists joined the anti-war contingent and reached hundreds in the Martin Luther King, Jr. March on January 15, distributing deception dollars and talking to many about 9/11 and other critical topics.
  3. Following the Sacbee's Newstand excerpt two 9/11 truth letters were printed in the Letters to the Editor, January 14, 2007.

Letter 1: 'False flag ops' and gatekeepers
"Re "From the newsstands," Forum, Jan. 7: Trust the 9/11 gatekeepers? We are tired of waiting for the gatekeepers to catch up! When are they going to at least acknowledge prior "false flag ops"? The Reichstag fire in 1933, the Gladio paramilitary terrorism operations in Western Europe during the Cold War, the USS Liberty incident of 1967 and Operation Northwoods -- the 1962 plan proposed by senior U.S. Defense Department leaders included terrorism on U.S. soil, crashing drone aircraft, people framed (to make it appear to be a Fidel Castro operation) and hijacked planes.

With such history, what system would investigate -- giving us the complete and utter truth, thus earning our trust? Or would that system just tell us to shut up? The 9/11 Popular Mechanics story provided no evidence to back up its claims and, despite experts listed in the article, cites only a handful. I trump Pop Mech with David Griffins' book "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions," one of his four on Sept. 11. And consider the work of the hundreds of professionals coming forward in groups such as Scholars for 9/11 Truth and the newly formed Pilots for 9/11 Truth and Veterans for 9/11 Truth. Why would WTC building 7 fall down when no plane hit it? Do all steel frame buildings collapse from a few small fires? Gatekeepers need not apply."

Letter 2: Whitewashing Sept. 11
"One third of the people of America, a very significant number, believe that people very high in our government conspired in 9/11.

What especially insulted me in "From the Newsstands" (Forum, Jan. 7) was this: the word paranoia.

For over five years, I have investigated every aspect of this brutal Sept. 11 event: No U.S. military planes in the sky even after almost two hours; as a former military radar technician, I know that is impossible, unless there was an ordered stand-down.

An airliner over Pennsylvania dives straight down into the soft earth below and yet one engine "bounces" two miles. WTC7 free falls in 10 seconds, many hours after the planes were gone, and is described by honorable and honest explosive experts as a planned implosion.

I have seriously investigated this conspiracy; the government provided a whitewash fiasco that did not even prove that the accused were guilty."


At 10:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sorry, what you purport to be facts on this web site are in almost every case little more than "urban myths." And please don't ask me to prove you wrong. The burden of proof is on the entire "truther" movement. And it has failed miserably just in bringing it's empty claims to the forefront of the world's consciousness. That's with a billion and a half Muslims out there who mostly love for it all to be true!

After more than five years of bleating, the truther movement is of little more consequence than The Flat Earth Society, the Apollo Moon Landing Was A Hoax Group , and/or the Holocaust Didn't Happen Movement.

At 6:50 PM, Blogger Trevor said...

The funny thing is you talk about burden of truth and give nothing but your opinion and or lies.

The media blocks the truth and thats why it's not mainstream, but the truth is the movement is growing and growing.

Look- Here is one good site listing top government officials who are coming forward.

Sorry buddy but, "And please don't ask me to prove you wrong" isn't enough of an argument to get us ignore the FACTS you so casually label "urban myths". The only urban myth is the official story.

Nice tie in with The Flat Earth society at the end though- once again attacking the messenger but never touching the message. We see this tactic over and over again.


Post a Comment

<< Home